Chapters 3 and 4 of Natural
Security by Sagarin and Taylor focus on how biological processes in the human
body have evolved to be highly effective against threats that are often
difficult to directly recognize. It is noted early in the reading that there is
no way to fully eliminate all threats to a population, which I think is vital
to incorporate into the reading because people often think that there is a
perfect solution to all the problems facing the military, when in reality it is
impossible to be fully prepared for an unsuspected danger if we don’t yet know
what the potential threat could be. This feeds directly into our class
discussions about how all organisms are constantly evolving because each
ensuing generation has the potential to encounter new problems that older generations
were not exposed to. Now the question comes to how have organisms been able to
constantly evolve to meet the challenges of new, unforeseen problems.
Sagarin and Taylor point to the
organization of our own immune system for the answer. The organization of the
immune system is decentralized, which means that an immune response is not
formed by a hierarchy, but rather individual groups of molecules work in
conjunction to solve the problems caused by various pathogens. Essentially when
the immune system encounters a problem, groups find problems and fix them at a
local level rather than looking toward a central decision making entity to
solve the problem for them. The argument for these chapters is that to have an
effective National Security, individual groups need to be able to specialize at
solving their security problems at a local level, because decisions can be made
more accurately and quickly, which is vital for the always changing threats.
This sounds really interesting Ausrin, I was wondering how in depth do the authors go in drawing the comparison between the immune system and national security. Do the authors have a parallel to the constant evolution occurring between the immune system and antigens?
ReplyDelete